National emblem
  • हिन्दी
Screen Reader Access

High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Latest News

×

RSS (Important Notice)

https://highcourt.cg.gov.in/cghighcourt.nic.in.xml

×

RSS (AFR)

https://highcourt.cg.gov.in/cghighcourt1.nic.in.xml

RSS LATEST NOTICE
  • Regarding constitution of benches for National Lok Adalat on 13/09/2025.
  • Endt No. 17685 Bilaspur, dated 01st Setember 2025.(Regarding allotment of H-type government residential house of High Court Colony,Sector -2, Bodari)
  • Endt No. 3966/HCLSC/PANEL/2025 Bilaspur, dated 29th August 2025.(Regarding panel lawyers of High Court Legal Services Committee, Bilaspur for Retainer Lawyers.)
  • Notification No. 287 Bilaspur, dated 30th August 2025.
  • Notification No. 286 Bilaspur, dated 30th August 2025.
  • Endt No. 17563 Bilaspur, dated 29th August 2025.
  • Endt No. 1063/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 29th August 2025.
  • Endt No. 17335/Rules/2025 Bilaspur, dated 26th August 2025.
  • Notification No. 17126/Checker Bilaspur, dated 23rd August 2025.
  • Notification No. 17124/Checker Bilaspur, dated 23rd August 2025.
  • Supplementary Constitution of Benches at High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur W.E.F. 26.08.2025.
  • Order No. 1055/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
  • Order No. 1052/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
  • Order No. 1049/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
  • Notification No. 1047/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
  • Notification No. 17106/Checker Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
  • Order No. 83(App.)/ Bilaspur, dated 20th August 2025.
  • Admit Card for Practical Examination to the Post of Staff Car Driver.
  • Order No. 16656/ Bilaspur, dated 18th August 2025.
  • Notification No. 16659/Checker Bilaspur, dated 18th August 2025.
  • Endt No. 16635/rules/2025 Bilaspur, dated 18th August 2025.
  • Notice Regarding the of Practical Exam for the Post of Staff Car Driver.
  • Endt No. 16499/Checker Bilaspur, dated 14th August 2025.
  • Letter No. 16272 Bilaspur, dated 13th August 2025.(Regarding allotment of I-type government residential house of Vikas Nagar, 27 Kholi, Bilaspur)
  • Application are invited from panel lawyers of High Court Legal Services Committee, Bilaspur for Retainer Lawyers.
  • Order No. 1035/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 12th August 2025.
  • Tender Notice No.16141/CPC/2025 Bilaspur, dated 12th August 2025.(08 nos. of LIU 12-Port Loaded, 12 nos. of OFC Module and 12 nos. of OFC Patch Cord 3 mtr SC-LC Dlink )
  • Notification No.1032/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, Dated 11th August 2025.
  • Notice regarding Swearing-in ceremony of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, as Judge of the Chhattisgarh High Court on 11.08.2025 at 10:30 a.m. in the Chief Justice’s Court.
  • Tabulation Sheet of the Written Test Held on 03/08/2025 for Recruitment to the Post of Staff Car Driver.
  • List of Candidates Qualified for Skill Test for Recruitment to the Post of Staff Car Driver.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
  • Circular No. 17327 Bilaspur, dated 23rd October 2024.
  • Circular No. 181 Bilaspur, dated 17th October 2024.
  • Circular No. 123/D.E. Bilaspur, dated 17th October 2024.
  • Order No 135 Bilaspur, dated 21th August 2024.
  • Circular No. 609/confdl./2024 Bilaspur,dated 24rd June 2024.
Whats New
Virtual Court
Live Streaming
Display Board
Roster
Cause List
Case Status
Order/Judgement
e-High Court Report (AFR)
Hindi Judgement
eSCR All High Court
Neutral Citation
Justice Clock
e Filing
Recruitment
E Gate Pass
LATEST A F R  RSS LOGO
  • An order of blacklisting should not be issued in ordinary cases of breach of contract because it has severe civil consequences, amounting to “civil death” and "commercial exile" for the affected party which bars a party from future contracts and damages their reputation. Blacklisting must be resorted to for egregious cases and not for minor violations or bona fide disputes, and must always adhere to principles of proportionality and natural justice.
  • Under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, the State is empowered to interchange vacancies among the five categories of specified disabilities if the nature of vacancies in an establishment does not permit employment of persons from a particular category; therefore, the reservation extended to candidates belonging to the “One Arm (OA)” and “One Leg (OL)” categories cannot be regarded as illegal.
  • Recovery of excess payment from employee — Impermissible where excess payment is not on account of misrepresentation, fraud, or fault of the employee but due to mistake of the employer. Employee cannot be penalised for the fault committed by the employer.
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Benevolent legislation — Just compensation — Non-filing of cross-objection or cross-appeal by the claimant will not preclude the Court from awarding just and reasonable compensation. The duty of the Court is to ensure award of just compensation irrespective of procedural technicalities.
  • A teacher holds a position of trust and responsibility. Any sexual, abusive, or exploitative act with a minor student is not just professional misconduct, but a grave criminal offence punishable under the POCSO Act, as it amounts to child exploitation and invites strict punishment.
  • Where the matriculation or equivalent certificate is available and authentic, the same shall be treated as the conclusive evidence for determination of the age of the victim/child. In such cases, no other material whether medical, documentary, or oral shall be considered for the purpose of age determination, and any deviation therefrom would be impermissible in law.
  • “In a Public Interest Litigation, when the petitioner is himself a party to disputes concerning the subject matter, and the same issue is already seized by the Court in another PIL including suo motu cognizance, the subsequent petition cannot be regarded as a bona fide public cause. Such a petition, being tainted with personal motive and vendetta, is liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs.”
  • “The academic distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' has always vexed the courts. The confusion is caused if courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions.”
  • When an accused faces charges under special statutes for offences against the State, the grant of bail is ordinarily discouraged. Courts are obliged to exercise exceptional caution and a rigorous approach, weighing the seriousness of the allegations, the protection of State interests, and the statutory limitations on bail prescribed by the relevant special laws.
  • The State, being the employer, can prescribe the qualification as a condition of eligibility for a particular post and can frame Rules with regard to recruitment and service conditions, and it can be declared ultra vires only if it is enacted beyond the legislative competence of the Constitution of India or is manifestly arbitrary.
                        The equivalence of a qualification is not a matter that can be determined in the exercise of the powers of judicial review, and it is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, to determine.
  • One of the self-imposed restrictions on exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India that has evolved through judicial precedents is that the Courts should normally not entertain a writ petition, where an effective and efficacious alternative remedy is available.
  • Non-disclosure of reliance on past records in the second show-cause notice violates Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India, where past records are foundation of penalty.
  • Gross discrepancies and lapses by prosecuting agency deemed wholly unacceptable; Trial Courts mandated to exercise vigilant oversight over actions of prosecution and Investigating Agencies to prevent accused from deriving undue benefit from prosecutorial derelictions, ensuring a fair and impartial trial, and upholding the sanctity of Rule of Law and due process.
  • The provisions of 22 of the BNS (Section 84 IPC) will come to rescue of an accused, when he/she was not knowing that what he/she was doing, is wrong or the same is contrary to law. In order to ascertain the same, the imperative circumstances and the behavior preceding, attending and following the crime are the main consideration.
  • In evaluating the testimony of a victim of a sexual offense, the Court's approach is nuanced, recognizing the inherent trauma and potential inconsistencies in the victim's account. The Court does not require an exacting or flawless recounting of the incident. Rather, it focuses on permitting the victim to share her narrative to the best of her ability, based on her recollection of events, within the bounds of reasonable possibility.
  • As long as the registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is in existence, further enquiry about the genuineness of the activities and the purpose being charitable cannot be gone into by the Income Tax Department.
  • Only the authority expressly empowered under the statute is competent to exercise disciplinary powers. Any order passed by an unauthorized authority is without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. Further, where there is a violation of the principles of natural justice or the impugned action is without jurisdiction, the existence of an alternative remedy does not bar the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
  • The fact that a witness is deemed “hostile” does not automatically mean their entire testimony must be disregarded. While the Court will scrutinize the evidence of a hostile witness with caution, it can still be relied upon in part if it is corroborated by medical evidence or if it is corroborated by medical evidence or if certain parts of the testimony inspire confidence.
  • In a money laundering case, as the modus operandi often involves circuitous and opaque financial transactions which makes direct evidence inherently difficult to obtain, the absence of verifiable legitimate income can lead the Court to hold that there exists a nexus between the property sought to be attached and the proceeds of crime.
  • “To succeed in an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC the defendant must satisfy the Court that his absence was due to a justifiable reason & unavoidable circumstances preventing his appearance”
  • In cases involving offences against the State and where an accused is charged under Special Enactments, bail cannot ordinarily be granted. The Courts are required to exercise greater caution and adopt a stricter approach while considering bail in such cases, keeping in view the seriousness of the allegations, the security of the State, and the statutory restrictions imposed on the grant of bail under such special laws.

High Court of Chhattisgarh

National Highway -130, Bodri
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495220

E-mail ID

: highcourt[dot]cg[at]gov[dot]in

Last Updated

: September 03, 2025.

e-Gate pass app

: Click Here to Download

Site is Designed and Maintained by High Court Computer Cell Bilaspur.
Hosted by National Informatics Centre (NIC), Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. NIC logo