Endt No. 1063/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 29th August 2025.
Endt No. 17335/Rules/2025 Bilaspur, dated 26th August 2025.
Notification No. 17126/Checker Bilaspur, dated 23rd August 2025.
Notification No. 17124/Checker Bilaspur, dated 23rd August 2025.
Supplementary Constitution of Benches at High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur W.E.F. 26.08.2025.
Order No. 1055/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
Order No. 1052/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
Order No. 1049/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
Notification No. 1047/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
Notification No. 17106/Checker Bilaspur, dated 22nd August 2025.
Order No. 83(App.)/ Bilaspur, dated 20th August 2025.
Admit Card for Practical Examination to the Post of Staff Car Driver.
Order No. 16656/ Bilaspur, dated 18th August 2025.
Notification No. 16659/Checker Bilaspur, dated 18th August 2025.
Endt No. 16635/rules/2025 Bilaspur, dated 18th August 2025.
Notice Regarding the of Practical Exam for the Post of Staff Car Driver.
Endt No. 16499/Checker Bilaspur, dated 14th August 2025.
Letter No. 16272 Bilaspur, dated 13th August 2025.(Regarding allotment of I-type government residential house of Vikas Nagar, 27 Kholi, Bilaspur)
Application are invited from panel lawyers of High Court Legal Services Committee, Bilaspur for Retainer Lawyers.
Order No. 1035/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, dated 12th August 2025.
Tender Notice No.16141/CPC/2025 Bilaspur, dated 12th August 2025.(08 nos. of LIU 12-Port Loaded, 12 nos. of OFC Module and 12 nos. of OFC Patch Cord 3 mtr SC-LC Dlink )
Notification No.1032/Confdl./2025 Bilaspur, Dated 11th August 2025.
Notice regarding Swearing-in ceremony of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Kumar
Agrawal, as Judge of the Chhattisgarh High Court on 11.08.2025 at 10:30 a.m. in the Chief
Justice’s Court.
Tabulation Sheet of the Written Test Held on 03/08/2025 for Recruitment to the Post of Staff Car Driver.
List of Candidates Qualified for Skill Test for Recruitment to the Post of Staff Car Driver.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Circular No. 17327 Bilaspur, dated 23rd October 2024.
Circular No. 181 Bilaspur, dated 17th October 2024.
Circular No. 123/D.E. Bilaspur, dated 17th October 2024.
Order No 135 Bilaspur, dated 21th August 2024.
Circular No. 609/confdl./2024 Bilaspur,dated 24rd June 2024.
A teacher holds a position of trust and responsibility. Any sexual,
abusive, or exploitative act with a minor student is not just professional
misconduct, but a grave criminal offence punishable under the POCSO
Act, as it amounts to child exploitation and invites strict punishment.
Where the matriculation or equivalent certificate is available and
authentic, the same shall be treated as the conclusive evidence for
determination of the age of the victim/child. In such cases, no other
material whether medical, documentary, or oral shall be considered for
the purpose of age determination, and any deviation therefrom would be
impermissible in law.
“In a Public Interest Litigation, when the petitioner is
himself a party to disputes concerning the subject matter, and
the same issue is already seized by the Court in another PIL
including suo motu cognizance, the subsequent petition cannot
be regarded as a bona fide public cause. Such a petition,
being tainted with personal motive and vendetta, is liable to be
dismissed with exemplary costs.”
“The academic distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable
homicide not amounting to murder' has always vexed the courts. The
confusion is caused if courts losing sight of the true scope and meaning
of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves
to be drawn into minute abstractions.”
When an accused faces charges under special statutes for offences
against the State, the grant of bail is ordinarily discouraged. Courts
are obliged to exercise exceptional caution and a rigorous approach,
weighing the seriousness of the allegations, the protection of State
interests, and the statutory limitations on bail prescribed by the
relevant special laws.
The State, being the employer, can prescribe the qualification as a condition of eligibility for a particular post and can frame Rules with regard to recruitment and service conditions, and it can be declared ultra vires only if it is enacted beyond the legislative competence of the Constitution of India or is manifestly arbitrary.
The equivalence of a qualification is not a matter that can be determined in the exercise of the powers of judicial review, and it is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, to determine.
One of the self-imposed restrictions on exercise of power under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India that has evolved through
judicial precedents is that the Courts should normally not entertain a
writ petition, where an effective and efficacious alternative remedy is
available.
Non-disclosure of reliance on past records in the second
show-cause notice violates Article 311(2) of the
Constitution of India, where past records are foundation of
penalty.
Gross discrepancies and lapses by prosecuting agency deemed
wholly unacceptable; Trial Courts mandated to exercise vigilant oversight
over actions of prosecution and Investigating Agencies to prevent
accused from deriving undue benefit from prosecutorial derelictions,
ensuring a fair and impartial trial, and upholding the sanctity of Rule of
Law and due process.
The provisions of 22 of the BNS (Section 84 IPC) will come to rescue of
an accused, when he/she was not knowing that what he/she was doing, is
wrong or the same is contrary to law. In order to ascertain the same, the
imperative circumstances and the behavior preceding, attending and following
the crime are the main consideration.
In evaluating the testimony of a victim of a sexual offense, the
Court's approach is nuanced, recognizing the inherent trauma and
potential inconsistencies in the victim's account. The Court does
not require an exacting or flawless recounting of the incident.
Rather, it focuses on permitting the victim to share her narrative to
the best of her ability, based on her recollection of events, within
the bounds of reasonable possibility.
As long as the registration under Section 12AA of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 is in existence, further enquiry about the
genuineness of the activities and the purpose being charitable
cannot be gone into by the Income Tax Department.
Only the authority expressly empowered under the statute is
competent to exercise disciplinary powers. Any order passed by an
unauthorized authority is without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.
Further, where there is a violation of the principles of natural justice or the
impugned action is without jurisdiction, the existence of an alternative
remedy does not bar the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of
the Constitution.
The fact that a witness is deemed “hostile” does not automatically
mean their entire testimony must be disregarded. While the Court will
scrutinize the evidence of a hostile witness with caution, it can still be
relied upon in part if it is corroborated by medical evidence or if it is
corroborated by medical evidence or if certain parts of the testimony
inspire confidence.
In a money laundering case, as the modus operandi often involves
circuitous and opaque financial transactions which makes direct
evidence inherently difficult to obtain, the absence of verifiable legitimate
income can lead the Court to hold that there exists a nexus between the
property sought to be attached and the proceeds of crime.
“To succeed in an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC the
defendant must satisfy the Court that his absence was due to a
justifiable reason & unavoidable circumstances preventing his
appearance”
In cases involving offences against the State and where an accused
is charged under Special Enactments, bail cannot ordinarily be
granted. The Courts are required to exercise greater caution and
adopt a stricter approach while considering bail in such cases,
keeping in view the seriousness of the allegations, the security of the
State, and the statutory restrictions imposed on the grant of bail under
such special laws.